OPINION by Ahmad Abbas, Business Development Professional of Reach Immigration
The premise of citizenship was cultivated many a millennium ago. To be a citizen is a term that has been defined time and time again throughout history.
It was Ancient Rome however, that truly defined citizenship. The Republic broke it down to a plethora of divisions; with the rights granted varying depending on the division or tier of citizenship a certain person possessed. The term Civitas, which means citizenship in Ancient Rome, was a coveted one. No other status in the world held as much grandeur as a Roman Citizen. The most powerful nation. The freest people. The centre of the world. All roads lead to Rome may be an adage in our time, but a couple of thousand years ago, it was the undeniable truth.
It was then no surprise that Roman Citizenship was a coveted gem yearned for by all subjects who found themselves under the direct rule of the ever-expanding Roman Republic. Freedom of movement and mobility were not concerns back then; the sheer amount of benefits of the Civitas however, were; chief among them the right to work in the Republic’s government and the eligibility for military service (both of which were accompanied by great honour and colossal riches).
The culmination of Roman Citizenship came under none other than Julius Caesar himself. The all-conquering general, consul, and eventual dictator paid excruciating attention to the granting of citizenship to those he had subjugated throughout his exhaustive and monumental campaigns. He would go on to lay the groundwork for the naturalisation of foreigners through a flexible and dynamic system that did not require any links such as language, residence location, or others.
At the apex of Julius Caesar’s glistening career in the late 40s BC, the concept of granting citizenship by investment (CBI), or citizenship by benefit to the Republic, as it was referred to back then, was already effective and in full flow. Yet it was Caesar himself who saw its true value and went on to make it a cornerstone of his patronage of the Republic.
Citizenship by benefit was mostly granted to aristocrats in exchange for funding or financial aid – much like the citizenship by investment (CBI) setup we can see in today’s global market. In a structure similar to many citizenship by investment programmes, Roman Citizenship aimed at gaining unencumbered funds that could be put to good use within the government’s treasury for internal development of the Republic. We can see a similar structure within Antigua & Barbuda’s citizenship by investment programme which has the sole aim of developing the country with the aid of its new citizens.
Roman Citizenship aimed at gaining unencumbered funds that could be put to good use within the government’s treasury for internal development of the Republic.
Benefit and development are the key words at play. They have been so throughout history and maintain that status till this day. The dawn of the 20th century brought with it a complication of mobility issues, albeit making world travel much more streamlined. The internet soon came into play, making the world that much smaller. Passports and citizenships became an integral part of social, political, and economic matters throughout the world. One thing remains constant however; all countries will always seek those who can benefit them.
Benefit and development are the key words at play.
With a pervasive communication grid in place, opinions of all parties can be heard much louder. With blusterous opinions on every single matter pouring out from persons of note throughout the world. The granting of citizenship by investment was not spared this unceasing battering. A hot topic for many politicians; immigration and citizenship has been under the limelight in every political campaign and road show.
The opposition would batter the premise of citizenship by investment by using terms such as “citizenship for sale” or “our identity for cash”. Terms that would have shook Caesar and the Roman Republic to their core. To the Romans, the granting of citizenship was a testimony, an accolade, of the recipient’s contribution and sacrifice to the Roman cause. There was no higher honour. Those who oppose the dogma of citizenship by investment do not factor in the positives but decide to outline what they perceive as negatives solely for the captivation of political backing.
It is outlandish to presume that the Roman Republic, a vast global dominating force that lasted between 753 BC to 1453 AD, would consider a philosophy that would harm it rather than benefit it. Citizenship by benefit was a foundation of the Republic’s growth and expansion; it would be foolish to consider it as a hindering factor.
Citizenship by investment attracts the successful, the daring, the distinguished. It aims to gain the best the globe has to offer. It is a two-pronged sword, benefiting the applicant as well as the granting country.
Citizenship by investment attracts the successful, the daring, the distinguished. It aims to gain the best the globe has to offer.
To Caesar and Rome, the granting of citizenship was not considered as a risk to the Republic in terms of losing their identity, but a way of spreading it. Romanisation of new territories was crucial, with Rome considering their way of life to be superior in every aspect. Thus, the more Romans there were, the better off the world was.
No citizenship by investment programme adheres to that mindset more than Antigua & Barbuda’s CBI with the country setting a requirement for the applicant and their dependents who were granted citizenship to visit the blossoming country for five days within five years. This short amount of time is not meant for them to create actual links or documented ties to the country, but more so to create an emotional one. Five days in Antigua & Barbuda are enough for one to get a taste of the culture, to experience the lifestyle, revel in the folklore, and absorb a bit of the identity. That in itself is a defining characteristic of the Antigua & Barbuda’s CBI in which, much like the ancient Republic of Rome, they aim to spread their identity globally.
Granting citizenship, be it by investment or otherwise, is a ploy for expansion, for gaining a loyal base of those who benefit the country. That was the ideology when Julius ruled supreme, and it remains the same till this day. Showing ties, or links, to the country does not need to come beforehand, but shall inevitably come afterwards. Granting citizenship will seemingly remain a debatable subject. The truth, however, is that it should be the absolute contrary. If any given nation on Earth is provided the chance to expand its base to those who shall benefit it, it must, as an obligation to itself and its wellbeing, jump on the opportunity to take them in.
Julius Caesar may not have been the first to employ citizenship by investment; it had long been engaged before his time. He was nonetheless the one to perceive its benefit, and the one to harness the abundance of rewards that came with it. We should follow by example one of the greatest minds, and subsequently one of the greatest nations, that our world has ever witnessed. The pathway to prominence for both the granter of citizenship as well as the grantee has never been so unhindered.
Julius Caesar was granted four triumphs for his military success with Rome. One may argue he should have been awarded a fifth for his reforms that were endeared by all its subjects. It is by his footsteps that we must learn. As Caesar himself once said “Experience is the teacher of all things”. And what better experience is there, than that of the world’s most prominent nation in history.
Ahmad Abbas
Is the Director of Content Services at IMI Daily. His role provides insight into the intricate details of investment migration while working with some of the biggest players in the field. Ahmad spent time in the US, the GCC, and now works in his hometown of Amman helping top RCBI firms elevate their content and marketing to the next level.